Regulation of the professional conduct of lawyers in the United States for their intervention as mediators

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/msc4.7-102

Keywords:

Mediator, Lawyer, Professional license, Consulting, Litigation

Abstract

The regulation of the professional conduct of lawyers as mediators in the United States is subject to different normative sources: a) rules of strict customary law or common law; b) strict legal rules of a written nature or statutes; c) norms of equity or equity law; and d) standards of professional conduct. The present research focuses on analyzing only the standards of professional conduct based on the implications in the process of obtaining and maintaining the professional license in light of the substantial comparison between the characteristics of the American and Mexican educational models with the differentiating approach. academic degree and professional license.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oscar Javier Solorio Pérez, University of Colima

Abogado por la Universidad de Colima; Maestro en Derecho de la Propiedad Intelectual por la Universidad The John Marshall Law School de Chicago, Illinois, USA; y Doctor en Derecho por la Universidad de Guadalajara. Ha sido miembro del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI), Nivel I; profesor invitado de la academia de la Organización Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual (OMPI) con sede en Ginebra, Suiza; y Consultor del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID), con sede en Washington, D.C. En la Universidad de Colima, actualmente es director general de vinculación y profesor-investigador de carrera. Ha sido coordinador académico de la Facultad de Derecho; director del Programa de Propiedad Intelectual y director del Instituto Universitario de Investigaciones Jurídicas

References

American Bar Association, A. (2006). Formal Ethics Opinion 06-439. Chicago: ABA.

Covington, J. (1970). A Uniform Bar Examination—National or Regional: Is It Possible or Practical?—Panel Discussion. The Bar Examiner, 3-4.

Covington, J. (1971). The Multi-State Bar Examination Program . The Bar Examiner, 90-91.

National Conference of Bar Examiners, N. (22 de abril de 2024). Jurisdictions information. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

National Conference of Bar Examiners, N. (22 de abril de 2024). Model Rules of Professional Conduct - Table of Contents. Chicago, Illinois, USA.

NCBE, N. C. (2022). The Bar Examiner print edition,Fall 2022.

NCBE, N. C. (22 de abril de 2024). ncbex.org. Obtenido de ncbex.org/jurisdictions: https://www.ncbex.org/jurisdictions

NCBE, N. C. (22 de abril de 2024). ncbex.org. Obtenido de ncbex.org/jurisdictions: https://www.ncbex.org/jurisdictions

NCBE, T. N. (26 de junio de 2018). National Conference of Bar Examiners: MBE, MEE, MPRE, MPT Multistate Tests. USA.

Secretaría de Educación Pública, G. d. (2000). ACUERDO número 279 por el que se establecen los trámites y procedimientos relacionados con el reconocimiento de validez oficial de estudios del tipo superior. México: Diario Oficial de la Federación.

Secretaría de Educación Pública, G. d. (2018). Acuerdo número 18/11/18.Lineamientos por los que se conceptualizan y definen los niveles, modalidades y opciones educativas. México: Secretaría de Educación Pública.

The National Conference of Bar Examiners, A. (26 de junio de 2018). americanbar.org. Obtenido de americanbar.org/groups: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_education/resources/bar_admissions/bartests/

The National Conference of Bar Examiners, N. (26 de junio de 2018). Americanbar.org. Obtenido de https://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_education/resources/bar_admissions/bartests/

Published

2024-07-02

How to Cite

Solorio Pérez, O. J. (2024). Regulation of the professional conduct of lawyers in the United States for their intervention as mediators. Journal MSC Métodos De Solución De Conflictos. Revista Internacional De Investigación Científica Y Práctica En MSC, 4(7), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.29105/msc4.7-102